Search for: All records

An explanation for why some species, such as non-avian dinosaurs, became extinct, whereas others, including mammals, survived the Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/Pg) mass extinction, 66 million years ago (Ma) is still debated. What were the mechanisms behind community restructuring and the emergence of new ecological opportunities after the K/Pg event, selectively driving extinction and survivorship patterns? Using Markov networks, ecological niche partitioning and Earth System models, we reconstructed disruptions in continental food web dynamics, simulating long-term trajectories in ecospace occupancy through the latest Cretaceous (83.6–66.0 Ma) and early Paleogene (66.0–61.6 Ma). This method uses partial correlation networks to represent how different trophic groups interact in a food web and builds on empirical spatial co-variations to explore dependencies between trophic groups. Our analyses are based on a spatiotemporally and taxonomically standardized dataset, comprising more than 1,600 fossil occurrences representing more than 470 genera of fish, salamanders, frogs, albanerpetontids, lizards, snakes, champsosaurs, turtles, crocodylians, dinosaurs (including birds), and mammals across the best sampled region for this interval, the Western Interior of North America. We explicitly tested whether: 1) shifts in food web architecture underwent major restructuring before and after the K/Pg transition, including whether some trophic guilds were more prone to these shifts than others; and 2) any of these changes were associated with fluctuations in the realized niche space, helping to explain survivorship and extinction patterns at the boundary. We find a shift in latest Cretaceous dinosaur faunas, as medium-sized species counterbalanced a loss of large herbivores, but that dinosaur niches were otherwise resilient and static until the K/Pg boundary. Smaller terrestrial vertebrates, including mammals, followed a consistent trajectory of increasing trophic impact and relaxation of ecological niche limits that began in the Cretaceous and continued after the extinction. Patterns of mammalian ecological radiation and niche restructuring indicate that these taxa did not simply proliferate after the extinction; rather, their earlier ecological diversification might have helped them survive the K/Pg event, whereas the static niche of dinosaurs might have contributed to their demise. 

The first Cretaceous mammals described from India were recovered from the Naskal locality, located near the village of Naskal in the state of Telangana. The Naskal locality is located on the eastern edge of the Deccan Traps Volcanic Province (DTVP), where it is preserved between two basalt flows. Naskal and similarly preserved sites are “intertrappean” in position and are distinguished from “infratrappean” sedimentary exposures, which are positionally below the locally lowest basalt flow. Historically, this field-based designation has been used as a proxy for relative age assignments, with intertrappean sites generally considered to be of similar age to each other, but collectively younger than infratrappean (Lameta Formation) sites. However, the DTVP flow stratigraphy is complex, so this age proxy can be incomplete and misleading. Moreover, because the DTVP eruptions spanned the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary (KPB), it is often unknown whether intertrappean sites, including Naskal, are Cretaceous or Paleogene in age. Naskal accounts for nearly half of published mammal records from DVTP-associated sediments, as well as a host of other microfossils. The age of the Naskal locality takes on singular importance in the context of mammalian evolution in India and the effects of the end-Cretaceous mass extinction and subsequent evolutionary radiation. Here we present evidence from 40Ar/39Ar geochronology, magnetostratigraphy, and chemostratigraphy of the over- and underlying basalt flows to narrow the permissible age of the sediments at the Naskal locality. In conjunction with palynostratigraphy and vertebrate biostratigraphy, this site can be confidently restricted to a <100 ka interval spanning the KPB. The most probable 40Ar/39Ar age is latest Cretaceous, but an earliest Paleogene age cannot be ruled out. We explore the implications of this age assignment, and additionally describe two new mammal species from the same genus from Naskal.